Skip to content

Striking back at bosses: solidarity networks and sexual assault

Seattle Solidarity Network

Seattle Solidarity Network

by Juan Conatz

Trigger Warning: Sexual Assault

In the IWW, we sometimes have to deal with two different problems: How do we approach situations where we have left our job (but still have a problem with our employer) and how do we deal with harassment and assault in the workplace?

Wobblies in Seattle have taken on the first question. Wanting to build organizing skills and fight back against bosses and landlords in their area, they started the Seattle Solidarity Network (‘SeaSol’).

SeaSol is a network of volunteers, open to workers both employed and unemployed, that takes on workplace and housing fights through a strategy of escalation of tactics. For instance, a tenant is denied their security deposit. Attempts to contact the landlord are ignored or delayed. SeaSol will march in with 30 people and hand the landlord a demand letter telling them to give the renter their deposit in a certain amount of time or else. If the landlord doesn’t give in, pickets will follow, and so on.

Harassment and assault in the workplace is something that has been less thought about by union organizers or the left in general, even less than the fights SeaSol typically takes on. Some of us in the union have briefly addressed sexual harassment on shopfloor, but it’s still an ongoing conversation. Seemingly not talked about at all is the issue of assault, sexual or otherwise. During the 1990s (the latest period with statistics I could easily find), there was an average of 35,000 incidents of workplace sexual assault each year.

What should be our response when this happens? What can our response be? In the following situation, these two problems intersected, and Wobblies came up with a way to address it.

In October, a fellow worker was working as a bike delivery person at a local restaurant in Minneapolis. It was only his third week on the job and as was apparently the custom with new employees, the manager invited him out for drinks. At the bar, the manager continued to buy the Fellow Worker drinks for a while, until a certain point, the manager placed him in a cab bound for the manager’s apartment.

They took a cab back to the manager’s apartment, where he turned on music and made some drinks. At some point, the manager brought over and stuck under the nose of the FW a jar of some chemical. At this point the manager sexually assaulted the FW. The FW managed to leave the apartment before it went any further.

Understandably, after this experience, he did not feel comfortable working at this restaurant or with this manager anymore, and so stopped going to work. A couple of days later, after depositing his last check, it bounced, resulting in overdraft fees and charges.

This story, so far, is not unique, sadly. Wage theft and sexual harassment are widespread in the workforce and even sexual assault is not uncommon. All three go chronically unreported and when reported, penalties for the perpetrators often range from a slap on the wrist to no consequences at all. Direct action on these issues seem even more rare. However, this fellow worker refused to let this slide.

He met up with some of his former co-workers and IWW members from the Twin Cities branch and they decided they was going to march on the manager, demanding the money from the bounced check, reimbursement for the overdraft fees, and two weeks severance pay (including tips). The next day, he and around 15 Wobblies carefully planned a march on the boss, then walked into the restaurant and executed it and delivered a letter with the demands, noting that they needed to be met within 24 hours.

After some back and forth through text messages, in which the manager asked the FW to come pick up the check “without all those people” (this request was refused), the demands were met in less than 24 hours. The FW received a check for around $400.

This situation, while inspiring because of its end result, brings up very important questions for our union. How do we deal with wage theft, sexual harassment and sexual assault? What does a collective response to an often individualized, “personal” situation look like? This isn’t an isolated case. Much of our class shares these experiences. These are discussions I don’t have the answers to, but this story may reveal some insight into dealing with the various forms of oppression we face in our experience as waged workers.

11 Comments Post a comment
  1. Jan Nye #

    This boss should have been taken to court for sexual assault as well as for wages owed, especially after “drugging” the victim. What a creepy story. Makes me wonder how many times the boss has gotten away with harassment and assault.

    June 8, 2012
    • conatz #

      Yeah, Jan, I don’t know the conviction rate of bosses stealing wages and sexual assault, but I imagine its pretty low. In any case, I don’t think this FW wanted to go that route. I do wonder how often things like these happen. I couldn’t find much statistics for anything newer than the 90s. Probably a lot of them go unreported.

      June 8, 2012
  2. kenneth miller #

    We should urge workers to press criminal charges immediately. It is very difficult to move forward without pressing charges and making formal complaints in these situations. It is very difficult to come to someone’s defense if they are unwilling to press the complaint… the real issue is not always how to confront the boss, but how to be encouraging of the worker, encouraging them to step forward and make the complaint. They need to see their support network around them… that’s the kind of encouragement I mean. They also need to be mad and want to stand up for others.

    June 8, 2012
    • conatz #

      No, we should respect what people decide to do and offer our support in their decision. Pressuring people into a course of action is not acceptable when it comes to dealing with sexual assault.

      June 8, 2012
      • Kdog #

        I agree with Conatz. While organizers should help talk out all options, it must be the worker themselves directing the tactics – especially about something as personal as sexual assault. I am skeptical that pressing charges is necessarily the best route to take for obtaining justice, and it certainly shouldn’t be a prerequisite for solidarity. Finding other ways to alert other workers/customers/contacts of this kind of behavior is important though.

        Thanks for this article Juan, this discussion needs to keep going.

        June 8, 2012
    • Did you not just read the article? This guy and his comrades chose to directly confront the fucker and got what they wanted, fast. This demonstrates the strengths of solidarity networks perfectly. This would never have happened if the “fw” had gone to court.

      Good job i-dub, direct action gets the goods.

      June 9, 2012
  3. kenneth miller #

    so it seems to me that this action was not about the sexual assault at all, but about unpaid wages… the sexual assault narrative could have been left out entirely. The strategy implemented here does not seem to be about the sexual assault at all – the fellow worker chose not to pursue that – it’s about the unpaid wages. it is not clear to me that there is a lesson here about how to deal with sexual assault in the work place.

    June 9, 2012
    • conatz #

      I disagree. The unpaid wages were directly tied to the situation in question, as well as the unilateral power the boss seemed to assume he had. The assault and the wages were connected in my opinion. The lesson in this is that the worker wasn’t afraid to go to his comrades to deal with the issue, an issue that is often embarrassing, traumatic, and hard to tell people. I think the response gets us thinking about ways to deal with it and this is an example where something was done.

      Other situations might not involve wages, but the important thing I got out of what happened was making it a collective issue, which is a good indicator of where we want to head with this stuff.

      June 9, 2012
  4. kenneth miller #

    on the other hand, the fw chose not to be intimidated by the sexual assault. that’s an important lesson. I’m trying to figure out what the thinking is about why we might encourage people to file complaints, or not. The article does not mention a wage and hours complaint. Was there a feeling that filing a wages and hours complaint was somehow inconsistent with the direct action approach?

    June 9, 2012
    • conatz #

      Not really sure what your angle is…he won exactly what he wanted by direct action. If you’re in the IWW, what is the problem with this?

      I’m not personally against filing claims where appropriate, but we should always be thinking about direct action first. Mostly because this builds collective power and action, and also because it is often more effective. Filing claims often just individualized the issue and builds nothing.

      June 9, 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: